Connect with us

News

FBI Seeks Secret Court Filing Over Withheld Tinubu Investigation Records

Published

on

The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has asked a federal court in Washington, D.C., for permission to privately explain why it withheld parts of records sought in connection with past investigations involving President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

The latest development has added another layer to the long-running Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation over U.S. government records concerning Tinubu, including FBI materials relating to the early-1990s period.

The FBI’s application, dated August 20, 2026, asks the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to allow it to submit an ex parte, in camera declaration explaining portions of its decision that cannot, according to the agency, be justified fully on the public record.

The development is significant because it does not mean that the FBI has agreed to release the withheld records, nor does the request itself establish that the withheld material contains evidence of wrongdoing by Tinubu.

Rather, the FBI is asking the judge to privately examine its reasons for keeping certain information from public disclosure.

According to the filing, the FBI relied on several exemptions under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act when responding to requests for records concerning Tinubu.

The agency cited FOIA Exemptions 6, 7(C), 7(D), 7(E) and 7(F).

Among other things, those exemptions concern personal privacy, confidential sources, law-enforcement techniques and information whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to endanger an individual’s life or physical safety.

The FBI said it could not fully explain its reliance on Exemptions 7(E) and 7(F) publicly without potentially revealing the very information it was seeking to protect.

“The FBI has determined that it cannot provide on the public record the full basis for the application of Exemptions 7(E) and 7(F) to certain withholdings and that, therefore, an ex parte, under seal declaration is necessary,” the agency stated in its application.

In practical terms, ex parte means the material is presented to the judge privately, while in camera means the judge reviews it confidentially rather than as part of the ordinary public record.

The FBI has asked to provide the confidential declaration before August 28.

The dispute involves multiple FOIA requests filed by Aaron Greenspan, founder of PlainSite, seeking records from U.S. federal agencies.

One of the requests, identified as FBI Request No. 1588244-000, sought the entire FBI file relating to Tinubu. Court records show that Greenspan submitted that request electronically on March 29, 2023. 

A second request, No. 1593615-000, sought FBI Form 302 interview records involving Tinubu from an FBI case during the 1992–1993 period. The existence and description of these requests are also reflected in court records concerning the wider litigation. 

The FBI initially responded to the request for Tinubu’s file by invoking privacy-related FOIA exemptions and giving what is commonly known as a Glomar response—a response in which an agency refuses to confirm or deny whether responsive records exist where doing so could itself reveal protected information. Court records confirm that the FBI initially relied on Exemptions 6 and 7(C) in that response. 

The current dispute therefore concerns the extent to which information from those records can be released and what the FBI is legally entitled to withhold.

What do the exemptions cited by the FBI mean?

The exemptions cited in the latest application are important because they provide some indication of the categories of information the FBI says require protection.

Exemption 6 generally protects certain personnel, medical and similar files where disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

Exemption 7(C) concerns records compiled for law-enforcement purposes where disclosure could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

Exemption 7(D) can protect information provided to law enforcement under circumstances in which confidentiality was assured or could reasonably be inferred.

Exemption 7(E) protects information that could disclose law-enforcement techniques, procedures or guidelines, or information whose release could risk circumvention of the law.

Exemption 7(F) concerns information whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to endanger an individual’s life or physical safety.

The FBI’s reliance on these provisions therefore does not, by itself, establish what is actually contained in the withheld material.

Indeed, U.S. courts have previously accepted the use of confidential declarations where agencies argue that publicly explaining the basis for a withholding would itself disclose protected investigative information.

The U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Information Policy has documented cases in which courts reviewed FBI declarations privately in assessing Exemption 7(E) claims. 

The case has been running for years

The latest filing is part of a much larger legal battle that has been unfolding for several years.

Greenspan filed multiple FOIA requests between 2022 and 2023 with several U.S. federal agencies seeking records connected to investigations and other government activities involving Tinubu and other individuals.

The litigation has involved disputes over whether agencies can confirm the existence of particular records, what information must be disclosed and whether certain material can legitimately be withheld under FOIA.

Court records show that the case includes several requests relating specifically to Tinubu, including the FBI request for his entire file and the request for FBI interview records from the 1992–1993 period. 

The litigation therefore should not be interpreted as a newly opened FBI criminal investigation into the Nigerian president.

It is primarily a records-access dispute under U.S. freedom-of-information law.

Tinubu has joined the broader legal battle

The latest FBI application comes amid other developments in the same broader records-release dispute.

Tinubu’s legal representatives previously joined a request by U.S. government defendants seeking additional time to respond to a motion for summary judgment concerning the records.

The President’s involvement has attracted considerable political attention in Nigeria because the records being sought relate to allegations and investigations dating back to the early 1990s.

However, it is important to distinguish between the existence of historical investigative records and proof of criminal conduct.

The filing presently before the court concerns whether certain government records should remain withheld and whether the FBI can privately explain its position to the judge.

It is not a new criminal charge against Tinubu.

What the FBI’s secret filing could and could not mean

The request for an in-camera declaration is likely to generate considerable political speculation, particularly given the sensitivity surrounding the allegations connected to Tinubu’s past in the United States.

But the legal significance is narrower.

The FBI is effectively telling the court that it cannot publicly explain all of its reasons for withholding certain information without potentially exposing protected investigative details.

The judge would then have the opportunity to examine those reasons privately and determine whether the FBI has satisfied its legal burden under FOIA.

That means the confidential filing could contain arguments supporting continued withholding, but the fact that the FBI wants to file it confidentially does not establish what those arguments are.

Nor does it establish that the withheld records contain evidence confirming or disproving allegations against Tinubu.

Those conclusions would require access to the actual records or a judicial finding based on them.

Why the development matters politically in Nigeria

The timing is nevertheless significant.

Nigeria is already entering an increasingly intense political period ahead of the 2027 presidential election, with Tinubu seeking another term and Atiku Abubakar emerging as a major opposition figure under the African Democratic Congress.

The documents have also become part of the political contest, particularly because a U.S.-based lobbying firm retained by Atiku has publicised developments in the litigation.

That political dimension means every procedural development in the U.S. court case is likely to receive considerable attention in Nigeria.

For Tinubu’s opponents, the continued effort to obtain the records represents an opportunity to demand greater transparency about questions surrounding his past.

For the Presidency and Tinubu’s supporters, however, the fact that the matter is a FOIA litigation does not amount to a finding of criminal wrongdoing, and any allegations must still be distinguished from established facts.

That distinction is particularly important in reporting on the case.

The next significant date: August 28

The immediate question is whether the federal court will allow the FBI to submit the confidential declaration and, if so, what the judge ultimately concludes after reviewing it.

The FBI has indicated that it intends to provide the confidential explanation by August 28 if the court grants its request.

The court’s eventual ruling could help determine whether additional portions of the requested records must be released, whether the FBI’s exemptions are legally sufficient, or whether further explanations or disclosures will be required.

Until then, the most significant fact established by the latest filing is that the FBI is asking a U.S. federal judge to privately examine its justification for withholding some information relating to the Tinubu records.

It is not, on its own, evidence that the withheld records contain proof of drug trafficking or any other criminal offence.

That distinction will be crucial as the politically sensitive case continues.

News

Ogun Estate Dispute: Residents Accuse Adron Homes of Withholding Land Titles

Published

on

 

The coalition said it would return to the media when its demands had been addressed and peace restored to the affected estates.

Adron Homes yet to respond to allegations

When contacted on Monday, the Executive Director, Public Affairs and International Relations of Adron Homes and Properties Limited, Oluwakemi Osude-Laniyan, asked PUNCH Metro to send its enquiries through WhatsApp.

 

However, she did not respond to the message.

When contacted again on Tuesday morning, Osude-Laniyan said she was awaiting a detailed response from the appropriate department.

The company had yet to provide its response as of Tuesday night when the report was filed.

Continue Reading

News

Nigeria, France Target Increased Investment in Oil and Gas Sector

Published

on

Nigeria and France are seeking to deepen investment and cooperation in the energy sector, with stakeholders calling for increased capital inflows, technology transfer, local content development and improved infrastructure to unlock Nigeria’s oil and gas potential.

The call was made at an energy roundtable organised as part of the 2026 French Week by the Franco-Nigerian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

Participants drawn from the energy industry, government and diplomatic community identified gas development, energy transition, decarbonisation and regulatory stability as priority areas for expanding economic cooperation between both countries.

The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of TotalEnergies Nigeria, Matthieu Bouyer, said the energy sector presented significant opportunities to strengthen the longstanding relationship between Nigeria and France.

Bouyer noted that TotalEnergies, which has operated in Nigeria for 70 years, remained committed to developing local capacity, supporting Nigerian contractors and building sustainable partnerships.

“We see Nigeria not just as a market, but as a long-term investment destination where we continue to develop people, work with local contractors and build partnerships,” he said.

He disclosed that more than 100 French companies operate in Nigeria across sectors such as energy, infrastructure, logistics, technology, agriculture and consumer goods, providing thousands of jobs.

According to him, bilateral trade between Nigeria and France reached approximately $4.7bn in 2025, highlighting the potential for stronger commercial engagement.

Bouyer identified energy transition and decarbonisation, gas infrastructure and domestic utilisation, as well as technology transfer and local content development as three critical areas requiring increased collaboration.

He stressed that Nigeria’s energy transition must reflect its development priorities, particularly the need to expand energy supply while gradually reducing carbon emissions.

He added that improved gas recovery, methane reduction and energy efficiency could deliver environmental and economic benefits.

On gas development, Bouyer described Nigeria’s natural gas resources as a major opportunity for electricity generation, manufacturing, exports and industrial expansion.

However, he maintained that adequate infrastructure and a stable investment environment were essential to attracting the capital needed to develop the sector.

He also called for partnerships that would equip Nigerian companies with the technical expertise required to participate in more complex energy projects.

The Managing Director of Nigeria LNG Limited, Adeleye Falade, also highlighted the importance of natural gas to Nigeria’s industrialisation and economic diversification.

Falade disclosed that Nigeria had approximately 215 trillion cubic feet of proven gas reserves, while estimates of its wider gas resources stood at about 600 trillion cubic feet.

He argued that gas should be considered not merely a transitional fuel but a foundation for industrial development, clean cooking, export earnings and broader economic growth.

“Nigeria’s energy transition must be just, realistic and investable,” he said, noting that Africa’s energy development challenges differed from those of Europe, particularly regarding access to reliable electricity.

Falade cited NLNG’s Train 7 expansion project as an example of how international partnerships could promote domestic industrial development and increase the country’s gas production capacity.

He disclosed that engineering work on the project was 99.5 per cent complete, procurement was 99.8 per cent complete, while construction had reached approximately 94 per cent.

The project, expected to commence operations towards the end of 2027, will increase NLNG’s production capacity from 22 million tonnes per annum to approximately 30 million tonnes per annum.

According to him, the expansion has also created significant opportunities for Nigerian contractors and manufacturers, with local content accounting for about 95 per cent of the project.

He said approximately 16,000 people, largely young Nigerians, were engaged during construction, while wider project activities supported an estimated 40,000 jobs.

Falade added that Nigerian companies had manufactured several components, including pressure vessels, cables and valves, demonstrating the growing capacity of local manufacturers to participate in major energy projects.

He said the skills and facilities developed through Train 7 would support future industrial projects and strengthen the competitiveness of Nigerian engineering companies.

On NLNG’s economic contributions, Falade disclosed that the company had generated approximately $149.6bn in revenue since commencing operations, paid $47.9bn in dividends and remitted about $10.5bn in taxes.

He maintained that further expansion of production would increase government earnings through taxes, dividends and other payments.

The stakeholders called for sustained cooperation between Nigeria and France, stressing that stronger investment, technology transfer and infrastructure development would be critical to maximising Nigeria’s energy resources and driving long-term economic growth.

Continue Reading

News

Four African Universities Launch Consortium to Expand Nomadic Education

Published

on

Four African universities have joined forces to establish a consortium aimed at expanding access to education for nomadic pastoralists and other marginalised communities across the continent.

The initiative seeks to improve school enrolment, retention and completion rates among children in underserved communities through inclusive and flexible learning opportunities.

The partnership brings together Maryam Abacha American University of Nigeria (MAAUN), Kano; the Catholic University of Eastern Africa, Kenya; Capital University, Somalia; and the University of Namibia.

The announcement was made on Tuesday at a three-day international conference in Kano themed, “Strengthening Inclusive and Flexible Education Pathways for Nomadic Pastoralists and Marginalised Learners in Africa.”

In his welcome address, MAAUN President, Prof. Mohammad Israr, described education as a fundamental human right and a vital instrument for societal transformation.

He, however, noted that nomadic pastoralists and marginalised communities across Africa continued to face significant barriers to accessing quality education.

“Our responsibility as universities and educational institutions is to develop inclusive, flexible and innovative educational approaches that ensure no learner is left behind,” he said.

Israr explained that the conference provided a platform for stakeholders to exchange knowledge, share experiences and develop practical strategies for improving educational access among underserved populations.

In her keynote address, the Minister of State for Education, Prof. Suwaiba Sa’id-Ahmad, said the conference addressed both a national responsibility and a shared continental aspiration to guarantee quality education for every child.

The minister, who was represented by the Vice-Chancellor of the Federal University of Education, Zaria, Prof. Yahaya Bunkure, said the challenges facing nomadic children extended beyond securing admission into schools.

“For many of these children, the challenge is not only gaining admission into schools, but remaining in education, completing the learning cycle and acquiring competencies relevant to their lives,” she said.

She described access to education for nomadic and underserved children as an issue of equity, social justice, human dignity and national development.

According to her, Nigeria and other African countries must develop education systems that recognise the diverse circumstances of their populations and provide learning opportunities for children regardless of their location.

“Our responsibility is to build an education system that responds to the diversity of our people, reaches children wherever they are and provides learning opportunities that enable them to participate productively in society,” she said.

The minister urged universities across Nigeria and other African countries to intensify research into the factors affecting access, participation, retention and learning outcomes among nomadic and underserved children.

Also speaking, the founder of MAAUN Group of Universities, Prof. Adamu Abubakar-Gwarzo, called for the development of curricula tailored to the educational needs and lifestyles of nomadic and pastoralist communities.

He said such an approach would equip children in the communities with relevant knowledge and skills to contribute meaningfully to the development of their countries.

The Vice-Chancellors of the Catholic University of Eastern Africa and Capital University also participated virtually.

Prof. Elias Opngo of the Catholic University of Eastern Africa and Dr Ahmed Ga’al of Capital University, in separate remarks, emphasised the need to guarantee equal educational opportunities for children irrespective of their geographical locations, family occupations or personal circumstances.

They also advocated stronger cooperation among African countries, noting that the challenges associated with nomadic education required collective continental action.

The consortium is expected to strengthen collaboration among the participating institutions in developing inclusive educational approaches that address the barriers preventing nomadic and marginalised children from accessing and completing formal education.

Continue Reading

Trending